ELECTORAL FRAUD IN MEXICO

ELECTORAL FRAUD IN MÉXICO
EVIDENCE OF DECEPTION AND
JUSTIFICATION FOR A RECOUNT
OF THE "COALITION FOR THE GOOD OF ALL"

VOTES WITHOUT BALLOTS AND VOTES THAT

WERE ELIMINATED

Electoral fraud is visible and demonstrable in the

Mexican presidential election. The proof can be

found in the polling-site tally sheets as well

as in the real-time reports from the two

polling-data databases of the Federal

Electoral Institute (IFE): the Program of

Preliminary Electoral Results (PREP) and

the District Tallies (CD).

Every polling-site check and polling-site tally

contains three pieces of information:

1. The identity of the state, electoral district,

city, ward, and neighborhood, as well as the

nature of the polling location and its address.

2. The number of total ballots, their final

disposition, and the number
of voters.

a) The total number of ballots received at the

polling place before it opened for voting in

the presidential election.
b) The total number of ballots that were

not cast (i.e. not used by voters) and which

were thus discarded by officials.
c) The total number of citizens that voted.
d) The total number of presidential ballots

deposited in the voting
boxes.

3. The results of the vote.

a) PAN
b) Alliance for México
c) Coalition for the good of all
d) New Alliance
e) Social-Democratic and Agricultural Alternative
f) Write-in votes for candidates that were not registered
g) Nullified votes

All of this polling-site data can be found

in the Preliminary Results database (PREP)

of the IFE. In contrast, the District Tally

database (CD) excludes information about

the total number of ballots per polling place,
their final disposition, and the number of voters.

The CD database also does not record revisions

to the district tallies. It only reports the results of
the vote for each party, the number of nullified

votes, and the number of write in votes.

The polling-site check and the polling-site tally

provide the inputs for the two real-time databases:

the Preliminary Results database (PREP) and
District Tally database (CD). These tallies are

produced at the close of voting for the president

of the republic. Both polling-site tallies first feed
into the District Tally database (CD). The PREP

database should then be a spitting image of the CD.

ELECTORAL FRAUD IN MÉXICO

First problem

An analysis of 117,287 polling sites recorded in the

Preliminary Results database (PREP) that included

complete data in all fields—though excluding foreign

votes and inconsistent tallies—finds that The vote totals

(i.e. the sum of all the votes cast for the five parties
along with write-in votes and nullified votes) plus the

unused votes do not equal the received number of ballots

This discrepancy is prima facie evidence of tampering.

The sum of cast and un-cast ballots must equal the number

of ballots received by each polling place.

For example, if a polling place had 250 voters who cast

ballots and another 250 ballots that went unused by voters,

then the final tally should show 500.

However, this is not the case in the final tallies of

56,507 polling places. In turn, these discrepant tallies

affect 1,104,376 votes. Hence it is clear that in each

of these polling places votes were added or subtracted.
These tallies can be categorized as follows.

Polling places Altered votes. The total vote

plus unused ballots is greater than the ballots

received 22,932 740,451votes without support

by ballots.

The total vote plus unused ballots is less than

the ballots received 33,575 363,925 eliminated

votes

Totals 56,507 1,104,376 altered votes

Second problem

However, this is not all. If one were to exclude

all of the data from the above 56,507 polling sites

--so as to avoid any possible repetition of
similar “arithmetic errors”--and thus proceed to

analyze the remaining 60,780 polling sites,

you would find that

The vote totals themselves (i.e. the sum of all the

cast for the five parties along with write-in votes

and nullified votes) do not equal the number of

cast ballots.

For example, if there were 250 ballots cast in a

voting box, then the sum of the votes for each

of the electoral options must equal 250. In other
words, there cannot be more or less votes recorded

than the number of ballots deposited in the voting box.

Nevertheless, this is not the case in 6,739 voting tallies.

In turn, these discrepancies affect 199,465 votes.

Thus, it is clear again that in each of these polling places

votes were added or subtracted. These tallies can be
categorized as follows.

Polling places Vote totals
Voting totals greater than deposited ballots

5,652 123,860 votes without support by ballots
Voting totals less than deposited ballots

1,087 75,605 eliminated votes
Totals 6,739 199,465 altered votes

Third problem

Moreover, if the data of these remaining 54,041

tallies are analyzed using the names and registrations:

The vote total (i.e. the sum of the votes obtained

by the parties plus write-in and nullified votes) added

to the un-cast ballots should be equal to the list of

voters' names plus ten extra votes (ballots for

representatives of each party); i.e. the sum should

equal the number of ballots legally allocated to each

polling place.

For example, if the list of names of people who voted

at a polling place (which would be registered voters on

the voting list of that polling place) plus ten additional

ballots were to sum to 500, then the sum of the cast
and un-cast ballots should equal 500.

Nevertheless, this is not the case in 8,740 tallies of

polling places. As a result, there are 258,822 altered

votes.

Polling places Altered votes
Total votes plus uncast ballots that are greater than

the voting list plus ten 1,493 34,551 votes

without support by ballots

Total votes plus uncast ballots that are less than the

voting list plus ten 7,247 224,271 eliminated votes

Total 8,740 258,822 altered votes

Fourth problem

If the data on the remaining 45,301 polling-place

tallies is analyzed according to a different set of

criteria, we get another discrepancy. Cast ballots

plus the un-cast ballots that are less than the list of
voters plus 10

In contrast to the previous case, this analysis finds

tallies that show cast ballots equal to zero.

This situation can be found in 211 polling-place
tallies. As a result, there are 58,525 altered votes.

Total polling places
Total votes
Total 211 58,525 eliminated

Summary

The four previous criteria and problems sum to

72,197 polling-place tallies.

Criteria Votes without support by ballots

Eliminated votes
1 740,451 363,925
2 123,860 75,605
3 34,551 224,271
4 58,525
Total 898,862 722,326

Thus, in more than 72,197 polling places, there

are votes tallied that are either not supported by

voters or there are votes that were eliminated.

Moreover, in these polling places, the total number

of false votes added in an illegal manner is 898,862.

Whereas, the number of eliminated votes is
722,326.

As a result, according to the Preliminary Results

database (PREP), there are 1,621,188 votes that

were either eliminated or added illegally.

These irregularities and discrepancies were more

than enough to throw the election.

The Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) reported that

the difference between Calderón y López Obrador

was only 0.6%. This analysis has found that the

number of incorrectly eliminated or added votes

sums to 3.9% of the total vote.

PROOF OF ELECTORAL FRAUD IN MEXICO