"The Office" by Carlos Salinas denies "proposal" for discussion. The LIC Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador won bedate against the usurper SALINAS.


From:
http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2011/09/13/politica/015n2pol
La Jornada Tuesday September 13, 2011, p. 15
September 12, 2011
The office of former President Carlos Salinas de Gortari received a letter from Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador degree in which the front row of a false assumption. As shown in AMAI communication (which is attached), at no time ex-President Salinas said his desire to discuss with Mr. López Obrador or any aspirant to any elective office. Consequently, without merit "acceptance" of the defeated presidential candidate in 2006 to the nonexistent "proposal" to hold a debate with the former president.
So if a newspaper version prompted the presidential candidate and former candidate for the office again to be invited to hold some kind of exchange with the former president, you can now check that this invitation has not happened. And you can bet that neither will happen, because, unlike Mr. López Obrador, former President Salinas did not engage in or participate in the ongoing electoral struggles.
Moreover, other lines of the letter from Mr. Andrés Manuel López Obrador of former President Carlos Salinas de Gortari split equally false and also alleged lack of support. No ideas or proposals. With its inquisitorial accusations spent trying to regain lost visibility, from destructive language that is characteristic against a group of leading figures in national public life.
Hence also the impossibility of holding with him a real debate of ideas and constructive proposals analysis, which is what is urgently needed in this hour of our country.
With these clarifications, the office will know that it makes on the subject of the nonexistent "proposal" for discussion, "accepted" by Mr. López Obrador, because it would continue to abound on a false premise.
Sincerely,
Office of former President Carlos Salinas de Gortari
.......................................
As you read this letter it is obvious who lost the debate, without even realizing it.
1. Salinas challenged to a debate:
Carlos Salinas de Gortari, challenged Andrés Manuel López Obrador to discuss the proposals of both. "It's going to fail. Not enough to say what you propose when we had the opportunity to govern, who already ruled can be evaluated, to subdue the acid test, to compare what they offer to proceed with what they have done to back", proposed .
2. Salinas begins with a fallacy that you could well be attributed to him:
Defeated presidential candidate.
But no candidate who steals the polls or the presidency, in the most vile, as it did Salinas in 1988. When ordered to kill PRDistas and journalists and when asked about these allegations, told reporters famously said: "neither hear nor see," and his "elegant rhetoric said," do not balls. "
Laugh the way that the "office" of Salinas, or who wrote the letter of the most ridiculous and unable to support the fundamental logic to answer a letter, saying:
- "This office received a letter of .... Andrés Manuel López Obrador degree in which the front row of a false assumption.
This is the first line that refers to the "Ex-President"
- "On Wednesday September 7 you said that he wished to discuss with me on matters of public interest. I hereby inform you that I accept your proposal."
continues the "office" Consequently, without merit "acceptance" of the candidate "
Another laugh more. A card with a foundation that does not exist to see who wrote the most stupid and unable to unite ideas, out of the office of "president", please. So it was a usurper government, a government's hesitation.
It is evident that the
pity poor Salinas, because how a person of this nature as perverse and as pathological, feel hurt a lot out of power usurped, because he can not keep insisting that they call the poor "EX-PRESDIENTE "poor thing sounds pathetic, what was, never will be.
3. Now it turns out that journalists, not only AMLO, but journalists can not do their work and are inefficient to have a "induced" to self "invitation" was never made, go to the inept Dóriga screwed up, because to him offered to make room for discussion. IF these journalists are so inept. What he meant was that I wanted Salinas discussion without any reply, as is their custom, without debate, without question, the authoritarian style.
According to Salinas everyone is wrong except him and his "office".
4. Salinas and his office said: "The other lines of the letter from Mr. Andrés Manuel López Obrador of former President Carlos Salinas de Gortari split equally false assumptions."
"False assumptions", as if they are alleged, then the pun is a reality. Accepts first Salinas are false assumptions!. Well, until something resonates logic in his letter.
Himself
and his office will show that what he says in his letter AMLO and his speeches are true, because a false assumption is true.
"And also lack of support." Lack of support only for Salinas, who was never brought to justice because Ireland is a country with which Mexico did not back then extradition treaty. So it was never shown to justice and did not face charges because never outrageous even though committed treason for the sale of parastatals, modifications to fundamental articles, 27 and to participate in the movement scandalous of capital abroad is volatilized.
5. Salinas continues with a phrase as visceral as it is particular:
"No ideas or proposals. Inquisitorial accusations with expenses of recovering the visibility is lost from destructive language that is characteristic against a group of leading figures in national public life."
The ideas just been dumped since AMLO presented his 50 points for a better government, not just the country but for each of the States in conjunction with personal advisers.
These ideas were to be resubmitted in the debate.
"The expenses indicated Inquisition," "destructive language" are words and rhetoric that this dwarf corrupt, Salinas, who often enter and exit through the rear doors of all the places in which it is "invited" to make use of washing the guilt of dishonesty and to bring a degree of violence the word, a very characteristic way of expression. It projects the image of violence in the other when he leads to violence is itself, by challenging AMLO:
"It's going to fail. Not enough to say what you propose when we had the opportunity to govern, who already ruled can be evaluated, to subdue the acid test, to compare what they offer to proceed with what they have done to back"
I wonder who sounds more destructive in its language, AMLO with:
I believe this meeting will be of great interest, because they hold you, as representative of a group of tycoons, was and remains primarily responsible for the ongoing national tragedy.
At the same time, I'm in the best position you to express all the critical remarks about my political action and served as Mayor of Mexico City. Both have had a public responsibility and as you says: "Those who already ruled, and can be evaluated by their actions and results."
and Salinas with his vulgar language and bully:
"It's going to fail. Not enough to say what you propose when we had the opportunity to govern, who already ruled can be evaluated, to subdue the acid test, to compare what they offer to proceed with what they have done to back"
But they say the fish dies by mouth:
and the usurper Salinas, yes, the fall of the system and the theft of ballots, backing down in the debate which challenged:
"The office of Carlos Salinas denies" proposal "for discussion"
Salinas, you are a defeated usurper defeated, to which everyone will remember him as such.
Poor little "ex-president"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TOMA DE POSESIÓN DE LA PRESIDENCIA POR EL C. ANDRÉS MANUEL LÓPEZ OBRADOR